Differences between Legal, Moral and Customary Rights...

1. Distinguish between a) Legal, Moral and Customary Rights. A legal right is one that is enforceable by law. Any citizen and can discover these rights. They can validly be argued in court and generally take preference to other rights. Moral rights are those that particular groups believe are right and just. They are generally derived from religion and reflect the values and attitudes of the group that holds them. Usually the moral rights held by the majority of the population are closely reflected in their legal rights. Moral rights vary depending on the group, for example, some groups believe men should have the right to take multiple wives. If there were a minority group who held such a belief in Australia, it would be illegal to†¦show more content†¦It was signed in Rome in 1950 and was designed to put into legal effect the statement of standards in the Universal Declaration. The Geneva Convention or the UN Convention on the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces (I). A famous convention - known for its use in high-profile crimes against humanity cases. It focuses on the rights of individuals, combatants and non-combatants during wartime. The convention goes into a huge amount of detail on what the government and military can and cannot do. It defines war crimes and condemns the ill-treatment of anyone not directly under attack. 3. Describe the limitations of those outlined above in protecting human rights internationally. To make a convention, declaration or agreement enforceable it must be signed by every country it applies to (i.e. every country in the world). This is obviously not always possible, which presents a problem. A law is less than useful if it is not enforceable. The reason a country may refuse to sign such a convention, declaration or agreement may have no connection to the agreement itself. Maybe due to some international squabble a country may refuse to sign a documentShow MoreRelatedConflict Between The Humanitarian Action And The East Of Ukraine Essay9660 Words   |  39 Pagespopulation are rarely manageable for the de facto states without external assistance, Humanitarian action may be instrumentalized, hence creating additional challenges for humanitarian actors. The core idea of this paper is to highlight the interactions between the Humanitarian action and its possible instrumentalization in de facto states. Understanding past conflicts, the response given by humanitarian actors as well as their challenges could be useful to grasp current and future humanitarian endeavours